What are the flaws of a scalp micropigmentation treatment?

There are many products and services that try to treat hair loss. Though there are many that are effective, none of them are perfect. Users are left to deal with their side effects and are content with the benefits they receive from treatment. Some just try to work around them and even combine certain remedies with others to maximise its advantages.

Among the treatments that are becoming more and more popular is scalp micropigmentation. A technician adept at his craft can easily create an illusion of hair that is sought after by those undergoing a balding condition. He can also use a client’s existing hair and create an appearance of a denser scalp. SMP is very low maintenance, it only needs to be cleaned daily and be kept properly moisturized. Any stubble upon its surface should also be maintained if the style that was performed was a “just-shaved” look.

A quality scalp micropigmentation treatment

Trying to specify an exact flaw with scalp micropigmentation can be difficult. The pros after all, far outweigh the cons. Any negative aspect of the procedure would probably be a matter of how the individual perceives it and is not really a conclusion based on sufficient evidence.

Some view the permanence of SMP a bit daunting. It would be pretty hard to remove without the help of a laser removal procedure. A hair pattern once layered would basically stay that way. This makes it inflexible to the style changes of the times. A man who may have had aggressive SMP in his younger years might want to update his look as he becomes older. This may be inconvenient for a person who is in a rush to change his appearance however it would only take a matter of days to alter the treatment to suit his preferred taste.

The pigments of this treatment are two-dimensional yet some people expect it to exude three-dimensional qualities. A person who would try to touch a scalp with SMP will be surprised to feel skin and not hair. The patient himself however should not be startled because he knew very well that the procedure was never meant to go beyond what it actually is. This notion then, should be restrained to make room for a more acceptable view of how SMP is felt when touched.

Texture may be something that could be added to this treatment. It might be a possibility in the future through innovative techniques and more research. Fading is another factor that could be improved upon. Four to six years is a long time before a patient needs to have a touch up performed on his SMP procedure however it would be a welcome development if he no longer needed to do so. A technician that is unskilled might make a mistake of layering the pigments too close together during touch up visits. This cannot be classified as a disadvantage however because it is due to human error instead of the treatment as a whole.

Scalp micropigmentation might find its main weakness through prolonged sun exposure. Fading can occur if the scalp is left unprotected for a long time. This would inconvenience the patient by having to visit the clinic just to have it rectified. It is true that wearing a hat can solve the problem. The drawback becomes obvious however when the patient would want to get a tan or go out for a swim.

Aside from limited amount of time outdoors, the flaws seem to increase because of personal preferences and technician error. Other than that the procedure can be said to have a positive effect upon those who choose to undergo it. SMP is definitely has more going for it than otherwise, and choosing an experienced clinic such as Vinci eradicates the potential issues that may arise.